Program Manager · Aug 2025 - Present · Cross-functional teams
Visit Website

Mount Sinai Health System

Transformed reactive firefighting into proactive system design-solving problems before they became emergencies by building automation and accountability into the foundation.
$300K
Estimated annual costs eliminated through analytics automation
85%
Change management compliance within 90 days
80%
Reduction in hiring operations cycle time

Operational Challenges

Legacy manual processes consuming resources that should drive strategic value

Manual report generation
1,700+ staff waiting on 12 recurring reports
$300K annual operational overhead
Change management resistance
New initiatives stalling at 40% adoption
Delayed ROI on technology investments

The Strategic Bet

Conventional wisdom

Continue following legacy process to handle the growing reporting demands and backlog

Data showed

The 12 manual reports weren't providing value proportional to their time value. Staff spent 40% of their time on reports that could be automated or eliminated entirely.

The decision

Stop manual data entry. Audit every report for necessity, automate what matters, eliminate what doesn't. Use saved budget for strategic initiatives instead of operational overhead.

Constraints & Trade-offs

Constraints and decisions that shaped product

Operating Constraints

Healthcare compliance requirements limit rapid system changes
Union agreements affect process modification timelines
Budget cycles don't align with urgent operational needs
Multiple stakeholder groups with competing priorities

Automate reports in waves rather than all at once

Instead of: Automate all 12 reports simultaneously

Why I chose this

Healthcare operations can't tolerate disruption. Wave approach allowed validation and adjustment between phases.

Consequence

Took 8 weeks longer but achieved 100% success rate with zero rollbacks. Department trust increased with each wave.

Expand

90-day change management sprints with clear metrics

Instead of: Open-ended change initiatives with flexible timelines

Why I chose this

Healthcare staff are skeptical of "transformation projects" that drag on. Short sprints with visible wins build momentum.

Consequence

Sprint model now standard for all change programs.

Expand

Multi-Initiative Program Leadership

Data-driven transformation across analytics, change management, hiring, and emergency response

1

Automation-First Mindset

Eliminated $300K in manual reporting by questioning every recurring process.

Result
1,700+ staff freed from waiting on manual reports; real-time dashboards replaced weekly emails with Excel files
2

Sprint-Based Change Management

Focused sprints with measurable adoption targets.

Result
2x faster than traditional 6-month rollouts

What I'd Do Differently

Reflection on what could have been done differently

Didn't involve end users early enough in automation design

Impact: First automated reports had formatting issues that frustrated department heads

Better approach

Co-design sessions with actual report consumers before building

Would have avoided 2 rounds of redesign and faster trust-building

Underestimated documentation needs for sustainability

Impact: When I hand off, successors may struggle to maintain systems

Better approach

Build documentation as I go, not as an afterthought

Smoother transitions and preserved institutional knowledge

Business Impact

Delivered measurable improvements across analytics, operations, and talent acquisition

$300K+ annual savings, plus accelerated strategic capability

Key Takeaways

1

Question every recurring process - "It's always been done like this" is not justification for $300K in annual costs.

2

Short sprints with visible wins build more momentum than long transformation projects.

3

Healthcare staff will embrace change if you prove value quickly and respect their expertise.

Get in Touch

Let's talk about
what you're building.

Interested in how I can help your team ship faster? I'd love to hear what you're working on.